Power Calc Toolsv0.2 · beta

Verification

Worked examples published by engineers, manufacturers and a building department, re-run through the same code that powers each calculator. The “This site” column is computed when the page is built, and the build fails if any result drifts from the published answer — so this table can’t go stale.

Voltage Drop

12 AWG branch circuit at 0.85 PF

Open with these inputs →

120 V 1Ø, 12 A, 12 AWG Cu, 100 ft one-way, PF 0.85 (Table 9 effective Z 1.7 Ω/kft)

Source: D. A. Snyder, PE — PDH Online course E426, Example 1 (2014)

  • Voltage drop
    Published 4.08 VThis site 4.08 Vexact
  • Voltage drop
    Published 3.4 %This site 3.4 %exact
Voltage Drop

250 hp motor feeder, 500 kcmil at 0.9 PF

Open with these inputs →

480 V 3Ø, 302 A, 500 kcmil Cu, steel conduit, 200 ft one-way, PF 0.9 (R 0.029, X 0.048 Ω/kft)

Source: D. A. Snyder, PE — PDH Online course E426, "250 Hp Motor at 480V/3Φ" (2014)

  • Voltage drop
    Published 4.92 VThis site 4.92 V+0.10 %
  • Voltage drop
    Published 1.02 %This site 1.03 %+0.59 %

This case found a bug. Until 2026-10-26 the calculator interpolated linearly between the Table 9 1.0-PF and 0.85-PF columns and gave 4.50 V here (8.6 % low). It now uses R cosθ + X sinθ (Table 9 Note 2).

Power Factor Correction

100 kW load from 0.80 to 0.97 PF

Open with these inputs →

100 kW, existing PF 0.80, target 0.97, 480 V 3Ø

Source: Eaton — Power Factor Correction Solutions and Applications, "Example: Improving PF" (2012)

  • Existing reactive power
    Published 75 kvarThis site 75 kvarexact
  • Capacitor bank
    Published 50 kvarThis site 50 kvarexact
  • Apparent power after
    Published 103 kVAThis site 103 kVA+0.08 %
  • Line current after
    Published 124 AThis site 124 Aexact
Transformer Sizing

Secondary fault current, 300 kVA at 2 %Z

Open with these inputs →

300 kVA, 208 V 3Ø secondary, 2 %Z with −10 % tolerance (1.8 %), infinite primary

Source: Cooper Bussmann — Point-to-Point Method of Short-Circuit Calculation, Electrical Plan Review

  • Secondary full-load current
    Published 833 AThis site 833 Aexact
  • Available fault current
    Published 46,273 AThis site 46,262 Aexact

The source rounds the full-load current to 833 A before multiplying (833 × 55.55); we carry 832.7 A, hence 46,262 A.

Electrical Load

2,800 ft² home with EV charger, 220.82 optional method

Open with these inputs →

2,800 ft², 2 small-appliance + 1 laundry circuit, range 12 kVA, water heater 3 kVA, dryer 5 kVA, dishwasher 1.5 kVA, EV charger 7 kVA, A/C 6.96 kVA

Source: Town of Truckee, CA — Residential Electrical Load Worksheet, step-by-step example (CEC 220.82)

  • General load
    Published 41,400 VAThis site 41,400 VAexact
  • Total service load
    Published 29,520 VAThis site 29,520 VAexact
  • Calculated load
    Published 123 AThis site 123 Aexact

Entered as an appliance, the 7 kVA charger matches the worksheet exactly. Entered in the EVSE field, the calculator applies the NEC 2023 220.57 minimum of 7,200 VA and gives 29,600 VA (123.3 A).

Cable Sizing

Nine 12 AWG THHN in one raceway

Open with these inputs →

12 AWG Cu THHN (90 °C column 30 A), 9 current-carrying conductors, 30 °C ambient

Source: Mike Holt — EC&M Code Quandaries (August 2008)

  • Adjusted ampacity
    Published 21.0 AThis site 21.0 Aexact
Cable Sizing

Six 12 AWG THHN at 40 °C ambient

Open with these inputs →

12 AWG Cu THHN (90 °C column 30 A), 6 current-carrying conductors, 40 °C ambient, 60 °C terminals

Source: Open Exam Prep — Temperature Correction & Adjustment Factors (NEC 2020)

  • Corrected and adjusted ampacity
    Published 21.84 AThis site 21.91 A+0.32 %
  • Allowable after 60 °C terminal limit
    Published 20 AThis site 20 Aexact

The calculator uses the 310.15(B) equation (factor 0.913) instead of the table value rounded to 0.91, so the intermediate value differs by 0.3 %. The allowable ampacity is the same.

Know a published example we should add?

Send the source and the calculator link through the error report form. Only inputs and numeric answers are reproduced here, with a link to the original. See Methodology for the tables and formulas behind each result.